Eminem Sues for digital royalties

SlickVikNewman

Hip Hop Super Villian
ill o.g.
Battle Points: 1
A 2007 lawsuit filed against Universal Music Group involving Hip-Hop megastar Eminem will finally go to trial over alleged downloading proceeds owed to the rapper.

Representing Eminem in the case is publishing company F.B.T. Productions.

The grievance revolves around what percentage of digital royalties Eminem should receive when Universal sells his music to third party networks, like the popular iTunes service.

Additionally, other proceeds like ringtones sales from phone companies are in question.

“The claims made by FBT Productions are completely meritless and we look forward to presenting our side in court,” UMG told AllHipHop.com in a statement today (February 24).

In the lawsuit, the entity claims Dr. Dre’s Aftermath is withholding $1.3 million in royalties, and violating the Detroit emcee’s 1998 contract that guarantees him 50% of established royalties from all music sales.

Although the pending trial does not involve a large amount of money, a winning judgment could potentially empower artists who normally receive the smallest revenue share from the music they create.

Currently, record labels have been selling artist downloads to thirds parties as distribution deals, which significantly lower any royalties due to them.

However, if the courts rule in favor of Eminem, these sales would now be viewed as licensing agreements, which normally entitle artists to an equal 50/50 split of royalties.

With the music industry moving exclusively to downloading, this potential breakthrough would be a literal difference of millions of dollars to musicians worldwide.

Because downloading is a relatively new development in the music industry, there is no precedent for the Central District Court of California to fall back on when interpreting the laws.

Universal Music Group holds some of the most lucrative catalogues in the industry, such as The Eagles, Nirvana, Dr. Dre, Kanye West, 50 Cent, Nas, Lil Wayne, Mariah Carey, Mary J. Blige, Aerosmith, and many others acts spanning all genres of music.

At press time, Eminem is not expected to appear.

However, Apple President Steve Jobs and Interscope-Geffen-A&M chairman Jimmy Iovine are named in the lawsuit and will testify.
 

Sucio

Old and dirty...
ill o.g.
Battle Points: 304
If Em wins this, a HUGE door will be opened to artists who are seemingly getting table scraps as opposed to the labels they are signed to.
 

God

Creator of the Universe
ill o.g.
1) You don't sue the head of your label. This seems really odd.
2) If this judgment would be in favor of Eminem, downloads may cost more.
3) This may empower the record companies to set their own prices for the cost of download, with the cover of "helping the artist get royalties" as the moral argument.

Record companies have hated iTunes' price-setting policies - a ruling in this case may give the record companies grounds to break it.
 

slik da relic

RS Jedi
ill o.g.
Battle Points: 1
no matter the profession, the "fan" is always the person that "pays" for it... meanwhile, the stuffed shirts at the top are makin BILLIONS of dollars... im tired of that bs... im happy if Em wins the verdict, hopefully, he's doin something other than music... look at the Yankees and Mets situation... theyre both getting new stadiums, yet they (the Yanks anyway) are askin for MORE money, even though both teams have some of the top roster salaries in the league!!! who's payin for that??? the "fan", thru $5 hot dogs and $100+ seats... 4gettin the fact that u got players on the team makin 25mil for one year... what needs to happen is to stop giving out these inflated salaries in certain positions... music artists like Em took his company thru the stratosphere... he's the reason Dre is back in the 1st place... where's the loyalty? he deserve everything he should in the contract if its true, and then he deserves a restructured one... just my 2 cents.

da relic
 

members online

Top