I mean, no doubt she knows a forum or subgroup I can tell them she sent me.
My prediction:
This stuff is moving so fast, soon we'll have separated tracks, plus effects recommendations, all bundled into a file that can be imported into any DAW.
At this point do you guys even know it's me posting this? I could be a bot. We already have a bot on here, we don't need any more.
Poor AI, facing the same difficulties beginner humans faced when it comes to drawing
I saw this one somewhere... maybe on here? No saw it from a friend I might have posted here. Some kind of ai vocal studio DAW or vst. But it's online and subscription. Looked decent tho had a couple of voices to choose from and you write in the words and draw/play in the midi notes. You can then edit the vibrato etc looked pretty sick. Definitely would benefit from broader range of voices. But would def be mad handyMy day job is in tech and I'm so sick of all the hype around AI . . .
It's a tool. It can do some cool stuff, but it's not what people think it is.
Everyone is focusing on generalized, end-to-end stuff - give it a prompt and get something back or get unsolicited content or design suggestions from Clippy 2.0.
That's not where the big opportunities are IMO.
Where it will shine is when people can start using it for more narrow, task-specific stuff.
For making beats, the killer app for me would a natural-sounding voice virtual instrument.
Imagine text-to-speech with the ability to control pitch, tempo, tone, etc. across a bunch of pre-built voice models.
It won't replace real vocalists, same as how my BBC Symphony Orchestra VST doesn't replace real orchestras, but it would be pretty cool.
Dude you don’t have to give them access to anything, you just have clicked login with twitter or something, you can sign up with just an email like I did.I mean, no doubt she knows a forum or subgroup I can tell them she sent me.
They already have that and did you play with what I posted? You can do all you said with the it.My day job is in tech and I'm so sick of all the hype around AI . . .
It's a tool. It can do some cool stuff, but it's not what people think it is.
Everyone is focusing on generalized, end-to-end stuff - give it a prompt and get something back or get unsolicited content or design suggestions from Clippy 2.0.
That's not where the big opportunities are IMO.
Where it will shine is when people can start using it for more narrow, task-specific stuff.
For making beats, the killer app for me would a natural-sounding voice virtual instrument.
Imagine text-to-speech with the ability to control pitch, tempo, tone, etc. across a bunch of pre-built voice models.
It won't replace real vocalists, same as how my BBC Symphony Orchestra VST doesn't replace real orchestras, but it would be pretty cool.
what do you use to create samples? Was messing around with Udio posted here but it seems inconsistent.I'm conflicted about this. On one hand, I have more opportunities to sample something just by typing a song description and pressing enter and I don't have to worry about copyrights or sample clearance (until the law catches up but who knows with AI). On the other hand, I do worry that if I submit a beat for a competition or a sync licensing opportunity that someone who made a beat in under 10 seconds gets selected and all the days and hours I've spent making my beat was all for nothing.